By Mike Weland
Nearly 10 months after
Idaho Congressman Raul Labrador gave the
thumbs-up and forwarded a nomination to finally
recognize a local hero with this nation’s
highest military honor, the U.S. Marine Corps did what
the man who made the nomination expected … they
punted.
|
Marine Lance
Corporal Ric Binns (foreground)
and team members Tom Powles, Joseph
Kosoglow and William Norman shortly
before the Battle of Hill 488. |
“Dear Mr. Binns,” wrote E. Himler,
LtCol, USMC, Assistant Head, Military Awards
Branch, by direction of the Commandant of the
Marine Corps, “This is in reply to your request
addressed to Congressman Raul R. Labrador
regarding upgrading the Navy Cross, which was
previously awarded to you for your service
during the Vietnam Conflict …”
“I didn’t ask for this …
why are they addressing this to me instead of to
Bob Adelhelm?” Binns asked.
“ … Lieutenant Colonel
Robert P. Adelhelm, U.S. Marine Corps, Retired,”
Himler wrote, “who has submitted a letter
outlining his reasons for the upgrade of your
Navy Cross, was not in your former chain of
command, and therefore is not eligible to submit
a request …”
LtCol Adelhelm (Ret) was
one of thousands of Marine Corps officers who
served this nation in the years since
Vietnam, nearly
all of whom, as part of their training, study
the Battle of Hill 488. It was an overnight
battle for a non-descript hill, where 16 U.S.
Marines and two Navy Corpsmen faced down a full
assault by more than 250 Vietnamese regulars who
were better armed, better equipped.
Six members of the platoon died, none of the
survivors walked away unscathed. Those 18 men
became the most highly decorated small unit in
U.S. Military history; to include one Medal of
Honor, four Navy Crosses, two posthumous; 13
Silver Stars, four posthumous … 18 Purple Hearts
… six posthumous.
Yet 12 did live to come away from
that battle … a fight that many, including
nearly everyone in the rear echelon who were
almost helpless to provide effective support,
thought was going to be another Alamo.
As a junior Marine Corps
officer, Adelhelm studied that battle, and was
proud of Jimmie Howard, the Marine Corps staff
sergeant and leader of the 1st Reconnaissance
Battalion, 1st Marine Division, who was given
this nation’s highest military honor for his
actions on that hill.
After his retirement, he
came to work with a man named Chuck Bosley, then
a union painter, who had been a private first
class on the hill that fateful night.
While Jimmie Howard stood
his post and kept the platoon in radio contact,
he said, the Marine who kept them fighting and
kept them alive was Lance Corporal Ricardo C.
Binns.
“If Jimmie Howard merited
the Medal of Honor, and I have no doubt that he
did,” Adelhelm said, “Binns’ actions that night
merited it two-fold.”
In the culture of the day,
however, only one Medal of Honor was given per
engagement, and that to the most ranking member
of the engagement.
“I didn’t expect much more
from the Marine Corps,” Adelhelm said regarding
his recommendation, “they didn’t bother to look
into this and took the easy way out, falling
back on rules and regulations and ignoring
merit. I’d hoped for more from the politicians
who said they supported this, but none of them
did more than go through the motions; none gave
an endorsement. They were there to take the
credit, if it came, but not to take a stand to
do what’s right.”
The chain of command, in
the military, is sacrosanct. What goes up had
better have a good written reason if the request
is to be considered. Had Raul Labrador or any
other member of the Idaho Congressional
delegation, all of whom said they supported the
recommendation, only added an endorsement; “this
deserves a closer look … I am interested,” the
Marine Corps awards branch might have take the
request a bit more seriously.
They might have had a
better reason to look at the merit of the
recommendation, rather than Marine Corps
regulations by which to deny a Marine Corps hero
who didn’t always follow Marine Corps rules and
regulations in garrison.
These are traits shared by
nearly every Medal of Honor recipient.
Ricardo C. Binns didn’t ask
to be a hero … he just happened to be there in
the right time at the right place. Instead of
giving up, he stood up and did the impossible,
throwing rocks when the grenades were gone,
laughing defiantly in the face of the enemy when
that’s all that was left to repel the enemy, and
to get his fellow Marines home.
His country never thanked
him for that, but the men who survived, most of
whom Adelhelm met and talked with before he
submitted his recommendation, said they’d all
have died if Binns hadn’t stood up and did what
he did. Even the man who won the Medal of Honor
for his action that night credits Rick Binns as
a hero … his recommendation for Binns’ Navy
Cross makes that clear.
A few days ago, Binns
received a letter from Congressman Labrador’s
office, saying they had done all they can …
sorry, the Marine Corps has ruled.
The Marine Corps also sent
Congressman Labrador's office information on how
they could accommodate Marine Corps requirements
by attaching a list of where they could write to
find people who might consider “his” request,
people who’d been in his chain of command during
the battle … the problem is, it wasn’t Binns or
the the Idaho Congressional delegation who
asked. That credit goes to LtCol Adelhelm, who,
though he submitted the recommendation, was left
out of the process due to privacy act concerns.
“My Congressman didn’t help
me because it involves a resident of
Idaho, and the Idaho
Congressmen didn’t communicate with me because
I’m from Florida,”
Adelhelm said. “This despite the fact that they
accepted the package and submitted it to the
Marine Corps.”
That lack of communication
left Binns befuddled, he said.
Of all the people he’s been
contacted by and talked to over the course of
nearly a year, Senate and Congressional
staffers, Congressional liaisons, only one,
Vicki Fulton, Constituent Services
Representative and Service Academy Coordinator
for Senator Jim Risch, has contacted Binns to
admit that his recommendation should have been
handled better.
|
Ricardo C.
Binns |
Ricardo C. Binns,
Lance Corporal,
United States Marine
Corps, at age 20, happened to be in a place and
time where he rose above and beyond the call of
duty, and in so doing, almost single-handedly
changed the tide of battle. Instead of a “last
stand,” the men on Hill 488 rallied time after
time, pushed and prodded by Binns, who went from
position to position, redistributing ammo,
directing fire, pulling to mind a scene from
“Beau Geste” setting an example and inciting the
men who still survived to laugh aloud in the
face of what should have been the final charge …
by sheer audacity.
“This is not the ‘Marine
Corps’ Medal of Honor,” Adelhelm said. “This is
the Congressional Medal of Honor … an award
bestowed by a grateful nation for service
rendered that goes above and beyond the call of
duty. Had Rick not been there, someone else
might have risen to the occasion … but likely
not. The fact is, Rick was there, he was the
right person in the right place at the right
time and he had the skill, personality and
temperament to do what very few people could
have done, and what no one in his higher chain
of command could have expected or accounted for.
That’s the definition of ‘above and beyond the
call of duty.’”
While he says he expected
the outcome, Adelhelm said he’s not giving up,
saying that this recommendation deserves further
review at a higher echelon.
“There are obvious
indications of impropriety in the awards process
and decision making back in 1966,” he said.
“Also, the way this Marine was treated after his
return from
Vietnam
after months of hospitalization by awarding him
an incomplete separation document DD-214, and
giving him a General Discharge despite his Navy
Cross and two Purple Hearts is mind boggling. As
a result, it took him years to get his record
corrected and resulted in years of lost benefits
and assistance that would have normally been
afforded a hero of his stature.
“I’m disappointed that the
Marine Corps awards branch didn’t at least bump
this up to the Secretary of the Navy for further
consideration, but without endorsement from the
elected officials, I’m not surprised …
it’s easier to defend a wrong decision
made years ago than to admit fault, despite
clear guidelines that apply in this case that
would allow reconsideration.
“I know the men on that
hill appreciate what Rick Binns did, and I think
we all appreciate heroes, and Americans have the
right to know who their real heroes are. I think
it’s our job, as a nation and a people, to
recognize them, and not let rules and
regulations deny us the chance to give credit
where it is due.”
In 1993, President Bill
Clinton overrode the various branches of the
military, forcing a review of award nominations
from World War II, and North Idaho
gained a hero, a man we’d been denied the chance
to honor since April, 1945. He was one of seven
soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen so
honored, and the only one to stand in front of
the President of the
United States
and bow his head to have that pale blue ribbon
bestowed. He was the only one still alive to
bear the burden the Medal of Honor brings.
Vernon Baker came home to North Idaho,
earned a hard living and became a neighbor. The
Medal didn’t change him so much … but it did
change us.
“By his actions on that
hill, Rick Binns proved himself a national hero
… a hero who has been denied due credit for far
too long for reasons we, as a nation, can’t
remember. It’s time this man be given the
recognition he deserves, and that we, as a
nation, be given the opportunity to express our
gratitude.
“Rick Binns has never asked
that he be recognized,” Adelhelm said. “True
heroes never do. It’s the obligation of a nation
grateful for their service to our country to
recognize those who go above and beyond the call
of duty on our behalf, to give them thanks … and
to bestow honor.”
|